Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
SportTrac Discussion
General Sport Trac Discussion
Another Very Sad Day for the USA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bill V" data-source="post: 956424" data-attributes="member: 54538"><p>fkent, I haven't heard that they have come back. And I wouldn't be surprised if they still stay away. The bill was passed and signed by supposedly taking all the fiscal implications of the bill out, which made the forum unnecessary. (I say "supposedly" simply because the definition of "fiscal implications" is up for debate, and likely to end up in court. After all, Walker and the Republicans have stated all along that the reason for needing this were fiscal. By their own definition, then, the bill has fiscal implications, and there are therefore legitimate doubts about whether the courts will find the passage of this bill without a quorum to be legal.) I've seen a number of interviews with noted WI constitutional specialists saying that the Republicans efforts to "have it both ways" (say that they need this change made for fiscal reasons, but avoid the quorum rules by saying that the bill has no fiscal implications) may end up killing it in the courts.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Even if the courts were to uphold this, the Democrats can still completely hobble Walker's financial plans simply by staying away.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bill V, post: 956424, member: 54538"] fkent, I haven't heard that they have come back. And I wouldn't be surprised if they still stay away. The bill was passed and signed by supposedly taking all the fiscal implications of the bill out, which made the forum unnecessary. (I say "supposedly" simply because the definition of "fiscal implications" is up for debate, and likely to end up in court. After all, Walker and the Republicans have stated all along that the reason for needing this were fiscal. By their own definition, then, the bill has fiscal implications, and there are therefore legitimate doubts about whether the courts will find the passage of this bill without a quorum to be legal.) I've seen a number of interviews with noted WI constitutional specialists saying that the Republicans efforts to "have it both ways" (say that they need this change made for fiscal reasons, but avoid the quorum rules by saying that the bill has no fiscal implications) may end up killing it in the courts. Even if the courts were to uphold this, the Democrats can still completely hobble Walker's financial plans simply by staying away. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
SportTrac Discussion
General Sport Trac Discussion
Another Very Sad Day for the USA
Top