Chrysler minivan plant is tops in productivity

Ford SportTrac Forum

Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Gavin Allan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
7,613
Reaction score
6
Location
Jefferson City, MO
The Ford plant in Hazelwood also saw last year's productivity worsen due to slumping demand for Explorer SUVs. As production tumbled faster than the automaker's ability to trim the work force, Hazelwood workers ending up using more labor to produce a smaller number of vehicles.



Free-falling Explorer SUV sales forced Ford to shutter the Hazelwood plant three months ago.






Chrysler minivan plant here is tops in productivity

By Gregory Cancelada

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

06/01/2006



For the second consecutive year, DaimlerChrysler AG's South assembly plant in Fenton was the most productive minivan plant in North America, according to the 2006 Harbour Report released Thursday. But the achievement was even sweeter because the South plant narrowly beat Japanese rivals, whose minivan operations were included in the ranking for the first time.



The Harbour report, put out by Harbour Consulting Inc. of Troy, Mich., is the most closely watched gauge of productivity in the North American auto industry. It looks at the 2005 performance of North American plants owned by the Chrysler Group of DaimlerChrysler, General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co., Nissan Motor Co., Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co.



Historically, the Japanese automakers have excluded a significant number of their North American operations from the annual study. For this year's report, however, Honda and Toyota only excluded one manufacturing operation each from the study, while Nissan excluded two Mexican plants.



Overall, Nissan was the most productive automaker last year, retaking the top spot after Toyota nudged it out in 2004.







Nissan used an average of 28.46 labor hours to produce a vehicle, versus 29.40 hours at Toyota. This includes the total labor hours spent by salaried and hourly employees to stamp parts, build power trains and assemble the vehicles.



Honda, GM, Chrysler and Ford followed with 32.51, 33.19, 33.71 and 35.79 hours, respectively.



Though GM, Chrysler and Ford continued to lag their Japanese competitors, the productivity gap among automakers is steadily narrowing, according to the Harbour report.



Chrysler showed the most improvement, shaving 6 percent off the number of labor hours used to produce a vehicle.



"We continue to stay on the right track toward our ultimate goal in 2007," reducing that time to under 30 hours, Frank Ewasyshyn, Chrysler's executive vice president for manufacturing, said during a media conference call.



The South plant, where about 3,300 people work, needed 24.02 labor hours to assemble a vehicle. It makes the Dodge Caravan and Grand Caravan and Chrysler Town & Country minivans.



However, rivals trailed by only minutes. Honda's plant in Lincoln, Ala., was second at 24.05 labor hours and Toyota's facility in Princeton, Ind., was third at 24.15 labor hours.



Despite the No. 1 ranking, the South plant's productivity worsened from 2004, when workers needed only 22.94 hours to assemble a minivan. Chrysler said workers needed more hours to assemble minivans because of last year's introduction of the Stow 'n Go seating and storage system at the South plant.



Changes in the production mix and overcapacity also caused other St. Louis area plants to experience lower productivity, a change from past years, when there were steady improvements.



Chrysler said Fenton's North assembly plant, where about 2,300 people work, needed more assembly time because of increased production of heavy-duty Ram pickups. The heavy-duty pickups are more labor-intensive because they have more content that must be installed.



Still, Ewasyshyn said the North and South plants will resume this year their trend of increasing productivity.



The Ford plant in Hazelwood also saw last year's productivity worsen due to slumping demand for Explorer SUVs. As production tum
 
Last edited by a moderator:
According to the report I saw, Ford Atlanta assy was the most efficient plant according to Harbour, it was the only Ford plant in the top 10. it takes us 15.37 hours to build a car.



Productivity Gap Among North American Automakers Narrows in Harbour Report 2006

Thursday June 1, 10:00 am ET

* The labor productivity gap continues to narrow among all North American carmakers.

* In-plant quality improvement has been the biggest driver of productivity improvement and is better for all automakers.

* Nissan leads all manufacturers with 28.46 total labor hours per vehicle (excluding Mexico).

* DaimlerChrysler improved assembly productivity by 6%, the biggest percentage improvement of all companies, surpassing Ford for the first time.

* General Motors had five of the 10 best assembly plants in North America, improving 3%, despite declining volume.

* Ford Atlanta was the best single assembly plant at 15.37 HPV.



DETROIT, June 1 /PRNewswire/ -- The manufacturing productivity gap among North American automotive manufacturers is smaller than ever as quality advances are driving productivity improvements and all manufacturers get more from their work force and capital investments, according to The Harbour Report North America 2006, the annual study released today by Harbour Consulting.





 
I hate to say it coming from a family that owns 3 ford products, Lincoln Aviator,Volvo s60 R, and my trac. But Chrysler seems to be making the right moves. Ford has to do something and quick... All I see is ford negative this ford negative that. Ugg it hurts. Bold moves... More like improved products stronger engines and a better PR department.
 
Top