Ford posts worst loss in its history

Ford SportTrac Forum

Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

TrainTrac

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2002
Messages
6,262
Reaction score
36
Location
Mahomet, IL
Gee, more good news from Ford...



Ford posts worst loss in its history



By TOM KRISHER, AP Business Writer



Ford Motor Co. lost $5.8 billion in the fourth quarter amid slumping sales and huge restructuring costs, pushing the automaker's deficit for the year to $12.7 billion, the largest in its 103-year history.



The annual loss reported Thursday surpassed its previous record for a year of $7.39 billion set in 1992. The 2006 loss amounted to of $6.79 per share versus a profit of $1.44 billion, or 77 cents a share, in 2005.



It was far from the largest quarterly or annual corporate loss on record _ the company now known as Time Warner Inc. reported a $97.2 billion loss in 2002, largely due to new accounting rules about how to value assets. Ford could not rely on accounting rules, however, for its staggering total, which represented a loss of $4,380 on each car or truck they sold in 2006.



Ford's loss also didn't surpass the worst such annual total in the auto industry. General Motors Corp. lost more than $20 billion in 1992.



Dearborn-based Ford expects more losses for this year. It expects to burn up $10 billion in cash on automotive operations through 2009 and spend another $7 billion to invest in new products.



The fourth-quarter loss was the worst final-quarter loss in Ford's history and its second-worst quarterly performance. Ford lost $6.7 billion in the first quarter of 1992, due mainly to accounting rule changes on health care liabilities.



"We began aggressive actions in 2006 to restructure our automotive business so we can operate profitably at lower volumes with a product mix that better reflects consumer demand for smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles," Alan Mulally, president and chief executive officer, said in a statement. "We fully recognize our business reality and are dealing with it. We have a plan and are on track to deliver."



Excluding special items, Ford lost $1.50 per share in all of 2006, worse than Wall Street predicted. Fourteen analysts polled by Thomson Financial expected a loss of $1.35 per share for the year, excluding special items.



Its shares fell 15 cents to $8.05 in morning trading on the New York Stock Exchange. They have traded in a 52-week range of $6.06 to $9.48.



Ford, faced with increasing competition from overseas rivals such as Toyota Motor Corp., is banking on a restructuring plan to pull it through this rough stretch. Mulally, hired from aerospace giant Boeing Co., is leading the drastic efforts to turn around the company.



Ford mortgaged its assets to borrow up to $23.4 billion to pay for the restructuring and to cover losses expected until 2009. About 38,000 hourly workers have signed up for buyout or early retirement offers from the company, and Ford plans to cut its white-collar work force by 14,000 with buyouts and early retirements.



Ford, which relied on truck and sport utility vehicle sales for much of its profits, was hurt last year as $3 per gallon gasoline sent consumers fleeing to smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles. Ford has seen its market share deteriorate in recent years. At the same time, Toyota has seen its U.S. sales rise, beating Ford out for the No. 2 sales spot in July and November.



The company has rolled out or will introduce several new or updated products during 2007, including the Edge crossover, new F-series Super Duty pickups, a redesigned Focus small car and an updated Five Hundred larger sedan.



But many analysts are skeptical that the products are strong enough to turn the company around.



Mulally said earlier this month that Ford's restructuring plan remained "absolutely the right thing to do."



Ford said that special items associated with restructuring costs totaled $9.9 billion for the year as the company continues efforts to shrink itself to match reduced demand for its cars and trucks.<BR
 
Institutions that hold the majority of the stocks are really fickle. I remember working for the software company that I left and they had 22 quarters in a row of growth and profit but the stock would either go up a few cents or go down a dollar because they didn't blow the numbers out.



Ford stock might be going up because they have a plan to get themselves out of this slump they are in so you have buyers thinking the stock will go up again in the long run.
 
So was this another "Bold Move" from Ford?:huh:



Ford to put all U.S. assets up as collateral for financing deal



Bryce G. Hoffman / The Detroit News



DEARBORN - In a bet-the-company move, Ford Motor Co. announced this morning that it will put all of its U.S. assets - factories, offices and intellectual property - up as collateral for a multi-million dollar financing deal designed to keep the company solvent.



The struggling automaker hopes to obtain some $18 billion in new financing "in order to address near- and medium-term negative operating-related cash flow, to fund its restructuring, and to provide added liquidity to protect against a recession or other unanticipated events," Ford said in a statement Monday morning.



That will include up to $15 billion in secured loans, which will be backed by most of Ford's domestic assets, as well as all or part of the stock it owns in subsidiaries like Ford Credit and Volvo.



"This is mammoth," said Bradley Rubin, an analyst with BNP Paribas in New York. "This is going to put tremendous pressure on the stock. It's going to put tremendous pressure on the bonds. It's going to make for a very interesting week."



He said the deal will likely force Ford to fix its North American business or die trying. The automaker has been hemorrhaging market share and grappling with skyrocketing costs.



In addition to the secured credit, Ford will also be seeking approximately $3 billion in new unsecured notes, which will be convertible into its common stock. The company said the size of each portion of the deal will ultimately depend on market conditions.



The unsecured portion of the financing deal is being arranged by Citigroup Corporate and Investment Banking, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.



Ford expects the deals to close by Dec. 31.



Ford spokeswoman Becky Sanch said it was the first time the company had used assets such as plants to secure financing. Earlier this month, Ford had said it was near an announcement on such a deal.



Ford shares fell 22 cents, or 2.6 percent, to $8.30 in midday trading Monday on the New York Stock Exchange.



Following the transactions, Ford said it will have about $38 billion at year's end to fund automotive operations. That includes cash, cash equivalents, loaned and marketable securities and available credit facilities.



"The additional liquidity should be sufficient to give Ford the ability to fund itself for several years, even with considerable negative cash flow," Rod Lache, an analyst for Deutsche Bank, said in a note to investors.



Dearborn-based Ford lost $7 billion during the first nine months of the year and has said it won't return to profitability until 2009.



The company has offered buyouts and early retirement packages to all 75,000 U.S. production workers and plans to shutter 16 plants to reduce manufacturing capacity to match lower demand for its products as part of its "Way Forward" restructuring plan.



"Ford's restructuring has been of the low cash cost rightsizing type and a bigger cash heavy fix-the-business restructuring could be in the works," Ronald Tadross, an analyst for Bank of America, said in a note to investors.



Some Wall Street analysts have questioned why the sale of part of Ford Motor Credit wasn't part of its restructuring update announced in September. Ford has said that it didn't plan to sell its finance arm.



At least two analysts said Monday that using assets such as Ford Motor Credit to back the secured loans makes it less likely that Ford will sell the credit arm.



Following the announcement, Moody's Investors Service downgraded Ford's senior unsecured rating to "Caa1," seven notches below investment grade, from "B3." But Ford's long-term corporate rating was affirmed at "B3."



"The company still faces daun
 
Once the value of the company gets low enough, I wouldn't be surprised to see some Chinese or Korean investors step in and buy the company lock, stock and barrel. Then they'll sell off the unprofitable pieces of the company to anyone who wants them, and use what's left to build rebadged Chery (Chinese brand) or SSanyong (Korean car division of Samsung) vehicles under the Ford name. :(
 
I forgot to mention. There are a lot of Ford vehicles here in Poland. The Euro Focus is quite popular, along with the Escort. The Escort here actually looks pretty nice. There's also a lot of Fords that sort of look like a Festiva. Small cars are BIG here. Probably because gas cost $4.50/gal.
 
I just heard on the news it was like $4,400 per vehicle. Not sure I heard correctly. All I know is Ford is never getting another dime from me.

 
Between the unions killing all the automakers and the lack of any "new or real "ideas for new vehicles,it is no wonder ALL of the American automakers are in trouble!!!:angry:
 
Perhaps Dell would be a good option. We order the car online, they build it to our specifications and they mail it to us in two weeks. Eliminates the sales person completely. If we have a problem, we can order the in-home warranty. The mechanic comes to our house to fix it. :)
 
You guys need to check your facts.



Ford is selling alot of cars in China. GM is leading the pack, but Ford is just behind the coveted Chinese automakers.



HOW GM, FORD RANK



Top 10 automakers in China, by number of vehicles made in 2006:



1. General Motors 880,706



2. Volkswagen 697,796



3. Hyundai 397,207



4. Honda 360,051



5. Chang'an 345,786



6. Toyota 306,632



7. Chery Auto 287,700



8. China FAW 287,590



9. Ford Motor 255,642



10. Renault-Nissan 238,639



Source: PwC Automotive Institute 2007 Q1 Data Release



They are only a few thousand in sales behind the Chinese domestic automakers.



The USA is the only market that is not making money. Ford is loosing just a few bucks per vehicle it sells. GM is leading the pack at over $2,000 loss per vehicle while Toyota, a baby in the US Auto industry is making over $2000 per vehicle.



I looked for the graph on the cleveland.com website, but the graphs were not on the website like they were in the newspaper.



Most of the problems with the US auto industry is the many different parts between the different vehicles.



Read this...



Detroit -- You've probably never seen the firewall, that slab of steel between you and the heat of your car's engine, nor do you care about it.



But the way it's designed and welded into vehicles may be the key to financial survival for U.S. automakers and the key to how much you pay for cars in the future.



Currently, Ford Motor Co., DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group and General Motors Corp. have dozens of firewalls.



But Toyota Motor Corp., the recognized leader in manufacturing efficiency, has only a few, and the only difference in those is the width. All the holes for wires and ducts are in the same place, and a worker at any plant worldwide can install one in almost any of Toyota's models because they fit the same way.



Ford did not properly invest in the pension funds when times were good. They spent too much money rewarding CEO's for lackluster performance.



It is no different then someone not saving for their future then trying to blame the rising cost of food. Blame the problems on the workers. It is easier that way.



Ford did not produce vehicles people wanted and they spent the time and energy on high profit automobiles. Gas prices go up, and sales go down.



Ford is the only automaker in the USA that has not "pawned" their assets until now. GM and Chrysler did that years ago.



Ford needs to streamline production before they can even start to make a profit in the USA.



Bring some of the vehicles in Europe to the USA would be a great start.





Tom
 
Regarding that firewall quote -- that is the key right there. Toyota puts thought into the way they design a vehicle. There is no inefficiency. Compare that to even the most modern Fords. Look under the hood and each model is unique. Further, they have dozens of hoses and wires exposed. Finally, we have situations where you either have to drill a hole or lift an engine from its mounts to change a spark plug.



They are cutting corners on design, and then the dealers and owners have to spend all this extra time dealing with their crappy design job. There gets a point where I was -- so fed up that I traded the vehicle for something new. I remember "R" being so proud of "his" redesigned ST. Well, I have never driven one, but how are you guys liking it, and have you compared it to a Tacoma or a Tundra? I seem to recall a few have already traded their '07s for something else. :(
 
Right, Nelson, Caymen, regarding the firewall topic.



If you take that topic further common sense would dictate that with less variation and more reuse of parts and subsystems from vehicle to vehicle, quality HAS to be improved when compared to another company that has more parts and subsystems used in fewer numbers across more vehicles.



It's also why when Toyota has a recall the number of vehicles affected often stagger similar recalls by Ford. And people here that just don't understand that dynamic and say things like:



"See, Toyota is worse...their recall affected 10 million cars, not just a few hundred thousand like Fords!"



They don't consider all the Toyota parts and sub-systems that NEVER get recalled because they were proven long ago across a dozen different vehicles and as-many years.



TJR
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They are cutting corners on design, and then the dealers and owners have to spend all this extra time dealing with their crappy design job.



Those problems have NOTHING to do with the union labor. It is directly caused by salary personal, but it is just easier to blame it on the labor unions.





Tom
 

Latest posts

Top