Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
Home Security... Please help.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thomas Rogers" data-source="post: 738911" data-attributes="member: 60724"><p>I was waiting for the tired and nonsensical argument about banning and restricting other things, like hand tools, and cars, because they kill and injure more people than guns a year.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's simply more "interference" and static to try to end the debate as I see it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Cars, tools, etc, all have some useful purpose that we as a society need. Still, we have made them (cars and tools) saver, and we have put restrictions on them; restrictions and safety precautions that are in-line with their danger, but not so burdensome as to reduce their usefulness in any meaningful way.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Guns too have a use and a useful purpose. They too can be dangerous and require the appropriate level of restrictions. As long as those restrictions don't limit their usefulness in any meaningful way then I have no issue with said restrictions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, maybe the gun advocates should show how the restrictions being placed on them are limiting the usefulness of guns. I think that would be very hard to show. Waiting to buy a gun, having to get a permit for it, etc...I don't see as hardships or limiting the useful purpose of a gun in any real way.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>TJR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thomas Rogers, post: 738911, member: 60724"] I was waiting for the tired and nonsensical argument about banning and restricting other things, like hand tools, and cars, because they kill and injure more people than guns a year. It's simply more "interference" and static to try to end the debate as I see it. Cars, tools, etc, all have some useful purpose that we as a society need. Still, we have made them (cars and tools) saver, and we have put restrictions on them; restrictions and safety precautions that are in-line with their danger, but not so burdensome as to reduce their usefulness in any meaningful way. Guns too have a use and a useful purpose. They too can be dangerous and require the appropriate level of restrictions. As long as those restrictions don't limit their usefulness in any meaningful way then I have no issue with said restrictions. So, maybe the gun advocates should show how the restrictions being placed on them are limiting the usefulness of guns. I think that would be very hard to show. Waiting to buy a gun, having to get a permit for it, etc...I don't see as hardships or limiting the useful purpose of a gun in any real way. TJR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
Home Security... Please help.
Top