Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
Missing Boy in the N.C. Mountains Found Alive.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thomas Rogers" data-source="post: 694924" data-attributes="member: 60724"><p>R Shek, I submit to you that it is Unconstitutional for the US Govt to establish a definition of marriage and to thereby recognize or not recognize marriages based on said definition. I say this because of the 1st Amendment. One's church, moral code, and peers should be able to define what constitutes marriage. Anything else has the govt defining morality and potentially religion for its people.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The biggest reason most that are against gay marriage have with said is that it redefines and cheapens what they believe if a holy institution defined by their religion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That fact alone clearly makes the point that the issue isn't gay marriage, but our govt's recognition and definition of marriage in the first place (straight or gay).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Get the govt out of the marriage business and the problem goes away.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>TJR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thomas Rogers, post: 694924, member: 60724"] R Shek, I submit to you that it is Unconstitutional for the US Govt to establish a definition of marriage and to thereby recognize or not recognize marriages based on said definition. I say this because of the 1st Amendment. One's church, moral code, and peers should be able to define what constitutes marriage. Anything else has the govt defining morality and potentially religion for its people. The biggest reason most that are against gay marriage have with said is that it redefines and cheapens what they believe if a holy institution defined by their religion. That fact alone clearly makes the point that the issue isn't gay marriage, but our govt's recognition and definition of marriage in the first place (straight or gay). Get the govt out of the marriage business and the problem goes away. TJR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
Missing Boy in the N.C. Mountains Found Alive.
Top