Murder...or Suicide???

Ford SportTrac Forum

Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

yankeegator

Active Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2003
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
Location
, FL
Alledgedly a true story...and just sick enough to be funny...







Murder Mystery..... Sort Of





Do you like to read a good murder mystery? Not even Law and Order would attempt to capture this mess. This is an unbelievable twist of fate!!!!







At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for Forensic Science, AAFS President Dr. Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the legal complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story:







On March 23, 1994.... the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus, and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr.Opus had jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to commit suicide...







He left a note to the effect indicating his despondency. As he fell past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing through a window, which killed him instantly.







Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide the way he had planned.





"Ordinarily," Dr Mills continued, "Someone who sets out to commit suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he intended, is still defined as committing suicide."





That Mr. Opus was shot on the way to certain death, but probably would not have been successful because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner to feel that he had a homicide on his hands.







The room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously, and he was threatening her with a shotgun! The man was so upset that when he pulled the trigger, he completely missed his wife, and the pellets went through the window, striking Mr. Opus.





When one intends to kill subject "A" but kills subject "B" in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject "B."





When confronted with the murder charge, the old man and his wife were both adamant, and both said that they thought the shotgun was not loaded. The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her. Therefore the killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, assuming the gun had been accidentally loaded.





The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident...





It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would shoot his mother.







Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the murder even though he didn't actually pull the trigger. The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.







Now comes the exquisite twist...







Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus. He had become increasingly despondent over the fa! ilure of his attempt to engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the ten-story building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story window.







The son, Ronald Opus, had actually murdered himself. So the medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.







A true story from Associated Press, (Reported by Kurt Westervelt)



 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is kind of funny, But the old man pulled the trigger. Never point a gun at some one, that should be considered murder..

Todd Z
 
I agree with Todd. Handle a weapon as if it is ALWAYS loaded. And what kind of ******* has a long standing track record of threating his wife with a gun. :angry:
 
Todd--



Even if it was a true story, my understanding has always been that murder involves intent. And the old man never had any intent of killing someone who happened to be falling past their window. At best, it would be manslaughter.



Similarly, it has always been my understanding that suicide also involves intent. And in this story, intent isn't present in the actual manner of death. He had intent to commit suicide by jumping from the building, but never by gunshot.



So if it were true, it would seem that the old man could be charged with some sort of manslaughter or negligent death charge, Ronnie (if he had lived) could have been charged with conspiracy to commit murder (of his mother), and, had the jumper been someone other than himself, could also have been charged in the death of the jumper. (I'm not sure if it would be murder or manslaughter, as there was intent to kill, but it was intent to kill someone other than the victim.) There was no suicide--in fact, there was only a failed suicide.
 
Top