Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
OT: Anti-War Protests Target Wounded at Army Hospital
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="K Mc" data-source="post: 541151" data-attributes="member: 60429"><p>FMarano - You are correct that none of us are ever going to agree, especially about politics but I think most of us can agree that a lack of knowledge doesn't help your side in a debate. Obviously the President DID NOT give approval, at least not yet. The BRAC panel gives it's recommendations to the President by Sept 8th. The President can accept it, reject it, or send it back for revisions. He can not "line-item" changes. Following the President's approval of the intial list or any revisions, it is sent to Congress who can accept it or veto it. The only thing that is obvious is you get your news from inferior sources, or you just parse the information that suits your needs. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You frame your initial comment as if the President acted to close the hospital for it's cost savings alone and were kicking those who use the facility to the street. If you have a Navy hospital and an Army hospital in the same geographical area, and one is more outdated than the other, what is wrong with combining them into a Joint Services Hospital and upgrading the facility to provide state of the art services in one location. The staffing and services are not being eliminated, they are just being relocated nearby to reduce redundancy. Maybe I'm missing something so if you or anyone can explain the benefit of udgrading two facilities at who know how much more cost, in the same area is better than a single upgrade combined facility I would be most greatful.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="K Mc, post: 541151, member: 60429"] FMarano - You are correct that none of us are ever going to agree, especially about politics but I think most of us can agree that a lack of knowledge doesn't help your side in a debate. Obviously the President DID NOT give approval, at least not yet. The BRAC panel gives it's recommendations to the President by Sept 8th. The President can accept it, reject it, or send it back for revisions. He can not "line-item" changes. Following the President's approval of the intial list or any revisions, it is sent to Congress who can accept it or veto it. The only thing that is obvious is you get your news from inferior sources, or you just parse the information that suits your needs. You frame your initial comment as if the President acted to close the hospital for it's cost savings alone and were kicking those who use the facility to the street. If you have a Navy hospital and an Army hospital in the same geographical area, and one is more outdated than the other, what is wrong with combining them into a Joint Services Hospital and upgrading the facility to provide state of the art services in one location. The staffing and services are not being eliminated, they are just being relocated nearby to reduce redundancy. Maybe I'm missing something so if you or anyone can explain the benefit of udgrading two facilities at who know how much more cost, in the same area is better than a single upgrade combined facility I would be most greatful. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
OT: Anti-War Protests Target Wounded at Army Hospital
Top