Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
Seattle Area Outage - Unions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thomas Rogers" data-source="post: 672297" data-attributes="member: 60724"><p>Q says: </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree with you there. IF the responsible party has displayed due diligence then they are blameless. I am a reasonable person, so of COURSE I have to agree with that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Clearly it is WHEN due diligence is not shown that some blame may be cast.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>R Shek stated that if we are to assume that the initial reports were true and that work slowdowns prolonged the outages (clearly not due diligence), then, yada yada.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, yes, a basis of my point is that there must be dereliction of duty. R. Shek even stated that dereliction as an assumption, and got slammed for saying something stupid because of his logical assertions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>P.S. The James Kim scenario had a single sign...about 8" x 5" centered on a pole indicating a seasonal, unmaintained road, but not clearly defining which of the two roads in the fork the sign referenced (the sign posts themselves were in the Y of the fork). The only other signage was the lettering on the road surface, which was covered with snow. Locals even painted the main road surface with the name of the road and arrows pointing the way because so many people during normal, summer weather take the wrong road. I bet real money that the signs change in the weeks to come.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>TJR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thomas Rogers, post: 672297, member: 60724"] Q says: I agree with you there. IF the responsible party has displayed due diligence then they are blameless. I am a reasonable person, so of COURSE I have to agree with that. Clearly it is WHEN due diligence is not shown that some blame may be cast. R Shek stated that if we are to assume that the initial reports were true and that work slowdowns prolonged the outages (clearly not due diligence), then, yada yada. So, yes, a basis of my point is that there must be dereliction of duty. R. Shek even stated that dereliction as an assumption, and got slammed for saying something stupid because of his logical assertions. P.S. The James Kim scenario had a single sign...about 8" x 5" centered on a pole indicating a seasonal, unmaintained road, but not clearly defining which of the two roads in the fork the sign referenced (the sign posts themselves were in the Y of the fork). The only other signage was the lettering on the road surface, which was covered with snow. Locals even painted the main road surface with the name of the road and arrows pointing the way because so many people during normal, summer weather take the wrong road. I bet real money that the signs change in the weeks to come. TJR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
Seattle Area Outage - Unions
Top