Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
Texas arresting people in bars for being drunk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richard L" data-source="post: 601895" data-attributes="member: 52972"><p>I understand the connection that you all are attempting to make. but the two issues are not connected!!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>1. A bar in Texas is considered a public place, and you are not permitted to be intoxicated in a public place. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>1. In San Fransciso, a man pees on the street and is arrested for peeing on a public steet or sidewalk.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So I will admit that both are public places. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The connection you seem to want to make a huge leap to, is that a restroom in a bar is a public place and a steet is a public place, so you should either be allowed to pee in the street or bars do not need restrooms, the patrons should just pee on the floor, or some other combination of the two? Or you are trying to imply that if peeing in public is illegal, then peeing in a bar is illegal since it is also a public place ????</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If that is what you are saying, and that you truely think there is any relationship to these to cases, then PLEASE STOP! That is totally bizzare leap in logic that it's not worth discussing. Our society dictates that public or private restrooms are a semi-private place even if they are part of another entity that is a totally public place. Your logic would never fly in court anywhere in this country. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>...Rich</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richard L, post: 601895, member: 52972"] I understand the connection that you all are attempting to make. but the two issues are not connected!! 1. A bar in Texas is considered a public place, and you are not permitted to be intoxicated in a public place. 1. In San Fransciso, a man pees on the street and is arrested for peeing on a public steet or sidewalk. So I will admit that both are public places. The connection you seem to want to make a huge leap to, is that a restroom in a bar is a public place and a steet is a public place, so you should either be allowed to pee in the street or bars do not need restrooms, the patrons should just pee on the floor, or some other combination of the two? Or you are trying to imply that if peeing in public is illegal, then peeing in a bar is illegal since it is also a public place ???? If that is what you are saying, and that you truely think there is any relationship to these to cases, then PLEASE STOP! That is totally bizzare leap in logic that it's not worth discussing. Our society dictates that public or private restrooms are a semi-private place even if they are part of another entity that is a totally public place. Your logic would never fly in court anywhere in this country. ...Rich [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
Texas arresting people in bars for being drunk
Top