Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
"Tolerant" NYC Liberals React to McCain Supporters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thomas Rogers" data-source="post: 819207" data-attributes="member: 60724"><p>R Shek,</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks for making my point. Scalia has provided one current opinon and ruling on the interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. If the amdendment as writter were perfect, if it were unambiquous, if it were clear in its intent and that intent could stand the test of time, then no such rulings would be needed. Right?!?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>However, such rulings do happen from time to time, and those rulings, not only the original words of the Constitution alone, shape our rights and our laws. Right?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, it's the words of the consitition and the rulings that are based on interpretations that define our laws and our rights.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, the same process that begot our current gun laws gave us abortion rights. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>TJR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thomas Rogers, post: 819207, member: 60724"] R Shek, Thanks for making my point. Scalia has provided one current opinon and ruling on the interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. If the amdendment as writter were perfect, if it were unambiquous, if it were clear in its intent and that intent could stand the test of time, then no such rulings would be needed. Right?!? However, such rulings do happen from time to time, and those rulings, not only the original words of the Constitution alone, shape our rights and our laws. Right? So, it's the words of the consitition and the rulings that are based on interpretations that define our laws and our rights. So, the same process that begot our current gun laws gave us abortion rights. TJR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Welcome to SportTrac.Org
Off Topic Discussion
"Tolerant" NYC Liberals React to McCain Supporters
Top