AWD/4WD, as explained by Ford

Ford SportTrac Forum

Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ReggieMRegalOne05 Legaspi

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
527
Reaction score
0
Location
San Diego, CA
This was a cut and paste from todays Auto Channel website news:

Quite long but worth reading



Ford Motor Company Experts Clear The Air On All-Wheel Drive vs. Four-Wheel Drive



IRVINE, CA - November 22, 2006: With the addition of the all-wheel-drive (AWD) Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, Ford Motor Company is now offering affordable AWD technology to a whole new group of customers, bringing it to one of the largest volume segments in the industry.

Many of these new customers may wonder why they need AWD on their midsize sedan, especially if they live in a climate where the roads are never icy or snow covered.

“Many people think about the AWD system on the Ford Edge the same way they think of the four-wheel-drive (4WD) system on their F-150,” says Ashok Rodrigues, 4WD technical specialist for Ford Motor Company. “There’s been a lot of confusion in the industry as to how manufacturers use the terms 4WD and AWD.”

Rodrigues says there are three basic types of AWD/4WD systems, regardless of whether they’re based on front-drive or rear-drive vehicles. Those are part-time, center differential and on-demand.

Part-Time Four-Wheel Drive

Part-time systems are what most people commonly think of as 4WD. These rugged, traditional systems, found on trucks including the F-150 and Super Duty, feature a simple lock and unlock mechanism that locks the front wheels to the rear wheels. Four-wheel drive is engaged by the vehicle’s operator, usually by flipping a switch or pushing a button on the dash.

Part-time systems are almost always marketed with a low-range gear that’s used when maximum torque is needed, for such activities as extreme off-roading or for moving a heavy object.

“It’s pretty much a black or white operation,” says Rodrigues. “You either want four-wheel drive or you don’t.”

The benefits of this system are its ruggedness and the fact that it’s inexpensive. Four-wheel-drive vehicles are at their best pulling a boat out of the water or hauling a Bobcat back in the woods. The downside is that the system isn’t really adaptable to everyday driving.

“With a part-time system, you will inherently bind up when you go around corners,” says Rodrigues. “When cornering, the front wheels want to track a wider arc than the rear wheels. Because all four wheels are locked together physically, you simply can’t do that with part time. It is an inherent part of the design and is fully intended.”

Center Differential

The V-6 Mercury Mountaineer uses a center differential that constantly splits torque 40 percent to the front wheels and 60 percent to the rear wheels. Unlike the part-time system, the wheels themselves turn at different speeds, eliminating the binding that part-time systems exhibit when cornering.

Center differentials need some sort of clutch or limited-slip mechanism to control slip. For example, when the rear wheels begin to slip, the clutch mechanism applies brake torque to the rear axle, sending drive torque to the front axle and keeping the vehicle moving forward. Rodrigues says that traction control can also serve as the clutching mechanism, providing a cost-effective means of applying brakes to the spinning axle.

“The nice thing about a center differential is that it’s always sending that torque,” he says, “so you have a very nice refined driving performance. Some people really like those kinds of systems. But they can be heavy, expensive and, as the devices are generally purely mechanical, there simply aren't many tuning options.”

On-Demand All-Wheel Drive

The third type is the on-demand system. An on-demand system is always driving one axle and then drives the other axle as conditions demand. In the case of the Ford Fusion or Ford Edge, the front axle is the primary drive axle. For the Ford Explorer and Mercury Mountaineer, the rear axle is the primary drive axle.

Simple mechanical systems use a clutch to send torque to the secondary drive axle<
 
Thanks for the post, Regal...



I guess that comment someone posted about the Merc Mountaineers AWD as reacting to slippage to engage is bunk...if anything it's just the opposite (it's always torquing and engaged in front and back just backing off as needed for turns, etc).
 
My brothers 1999 Explorer has Auto 4x4. It runs in 2WD unill the rear wheels slip, then it engages the 4x4. So depending on the year, the Mercury Mountaineers do react to only slipping of the rear wheels...unless the setting is set to 4x4.



That is not AWD either.





Tom
 
Right, Caymen what you are tallking about is 4x4, but in that last thread I was describing we were talking SPECIFICALLY about AWD.



I have included a link below to the thread, and was remembering MDM said:



I would not trust AWD. You have to be slipping for it to kick in.



Clearly the above description of AWD doesn't agree with what MDM is saying.



Here was the thread:



TJR
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No problem mdm. I was pretty sure at the time you weren't taking about AWD, that's why I asked if you were taking about transaction assist or something else besides AWD. No harm done.



It's great when we get REAL information like that posted above to educate us all.



Thanks again, Regal.



TJR
 
Auto 4x4 is a waste, you are correct. It is only good if you are slipping and need that extra traction to get moving. Besides that, it is worthless.





Tom
 
Caymen, I don't know that I would go that far. I think people confuse various setups with intended applications. If you are thinking auto 4x4 is a waste you are probably putting it into an off road situation. that was not the intended application of auto 4x4; auto 4x4 is intended for on-road application under variable traction challenged situations.



just like PT 4x4 is a WASTE on pavement, literally: it wastes your drivetrain.



that being said, the immediate example is the 07 with advance trac. off road, for dedicated use, go 4 high or 4 low as torque needs require. I will say, in a fair amount of slippery mud surfaced trails out in the woods (not hardcore hills, etc.) I was pleased with my 07s auto 4x4. 100 measurements a second seem to indicate prevention, not waiting to kick in.



All this being said, if you really have a hard on and a need for traction control, we are all wasting time unless we discuss lockers and center diffs that could be auto or manually engaged from the cab. But then again, those functions are married to a specific application.



structure/function related to application--that is the framework



 
Caymen, I don't know that I would go that far. I think people confuse various setups with intended applications. If you are thinking auto 4x4 is a waste you are probably putting it into an off road situation. that was not the intended application of auto 4x4; auto 4x4 is intended for on-road application under variable traction challenged situations.



Personally, I don't have a 4x4, but my brother does. I do know when driving on a slippery surface, you do not want it in 4x4 Auto. The clunking of the 4x4 system when it engages is stupid. With my 4x2, I slip, but I still get moving. With his, it slips, the vehicle makes a clunk then it takes off. The noise is enough to scare the crap out of you. That system is nothing more that a PT 4x4 with a transfer case that engages when a wheel slips. Besides that function, it works exactly the same as a PT 4x4 system.





Tom
 
PT 4WD works well for folks like me, who need it 5 days a year for snowy driving on hilly Ozark roads, and a few times a year for off-road hauling. PT is cheap, easy, and doesn't put as much of a gas mileage drag on the vehicle, especially with front hub locks.



Sure-- I'd love a full-time AWD system, with computer-controlled electric clutches/locks at the center differential and at both front and rear differentials like my wife's new Outback has, but then again, I don't feel I need to pay the high price for all that hardware either, especially since I understand how my system works and its limitations, and I know how to use it properly.
 

Latest posts

Top