Thomas Rogers
Well-Known Member
All this talk about unlikely odds and low statistics in this thread and a few others causes me concern. I am a conservative, I want little govt, not big govt, and I think our "sue-happy" society is doomed if it doesn't change it ways.
HOWEVER, with all that said, the bottom-line fact is that IF something is defective, or IF something can be made more safe why would you knock it?
I am not saying that the switch in the STs is defective. I am just countering the argument and arguments like: "So what, you are more likely to die from XYZ". Those are moot points. If I paid for a truck or some other product I paid for it to use it, and assume certain risks in using it. That vehicle catching fire when parked in my garage is NOT one of the risks I assumed. That's the difference between the liklihood of other things happening in other activities (like driving to work in the morning, etc)...I know those things are risky, and I accept that risk.
TJR
HOWEVER, with all that said, the bottom-line fact is that IF something is defective, or IF something can be made more safe why would you knock it?
I am not saying that the switch in the STs is defective. I am just countering the argument and arguments like: "So what, you are more likely to die from XYZ". Those are moot points. If I paid for a truck or some other product I paid for it to use it, and assume certain risks in using it. That vehicle catching fire when parked in my garage is NOT one of the risks I assumed. That's the difference between the liklihood of other things happening in other activities (like driving to work in the morning, etc)...I know those things are risky, and I accept that risk.
TJR