Bud Williams
Well-Known Member
School kids singing praises to Barack Hussein Obama...
Guess it has a better ring than Osama Bin Laden...:lol:
Guess it has a better ring than Osama Bin Laden...:lol:
Let the Indocrination begin...
- Thread starter Bud Williams
- Start date
Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:
Bill Barber
Well-Known Member
thats awful, let the brainwashing begin:angry:
Jimmodifier999 Boyles
Active Member
This is worse. Being showed in public schools K-12
I can think of four words...
"Set up video op".
Nothing to see here.
Tom
"Set up video op".
Nothing to see here.
Tom
Thomas Rogers
Well-Known Member
I love the whole "indoctrination of kids" conspirators.
For a conspiracy to exist, there has to be a motive, and that motive has to somehow give the conspirators something.
How does indoctrinating 8 and 10 year-old school children towards "liking" BHO help the president in any way? These kids can't vote until the man is well out of office.
I wish both sides would stop looking at the other for the "boogey man" and recognize that the biggest threat to them, and their party is THEMSELVES!
TJR
For a conspiracy to exist, there has to be a motive, and that motive has to somehow give the conspirators something.
How does indoctrinating 8 and 10 year-old school children towards "liking" BHO help the president in any way? These kids can't vote until the man is well out of office.
I wish both sides would stop looking at the other for the "boogey man" and recognize that the biggest threat to them, and their party is THEMSELVES!
TJR
Shaun Tucker
Well-Known Member
Scary stuff. I don't know if the President was visiting their school or something, but nevertheless, they should be singing traditional american patriotism songs.
Seems like the teacher in this case is forwarding her own agenda on to the kidlets who don't know any better.
Kind of reminds me of this:
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l_z_pHUKajc&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l_z_pHUKajc&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Seems like the teacher in this case is forwarding her own agenda on to the kidlets who don't know any better.
Kind of reminds me of this:
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l_z_pHUKajc&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l_z_pHUKajc&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Bud Williams
Well-Known Member
Molding those skulls full of mush early will have them sold by the time they can vote.
Have you ever seen that familiy of Klansmen episode on Maury Povich?
What about the Nazi's and what they were doing.
Isn't much different, especially when History is being re-written in text books with a
clear Liberal slant.
Have you ever seen that familiy of Klansmen episode on Maury Povich?
What about the Nazi's and what they were doing.
Isn't much different, especially when History is being re-written in text books with a
clear Liberal slant.
Jimmodifier999 Boyles
Active Member
The silimarities between the 1920s and 30s is creepy at best. A period of economic boom (1920-28, 1990-05). A recession/depression (1929-45, 2007-current). A populist clamor for change (Germany-1932, U.S.-08). War profiteers and rearmament (U.S. to Germany 1930s, U.S. to Russia 2009: GE cuts deal with Putin same day U.S. sells out Poland and Czech Republic). Anti-semitism worldwide. A socialist movement in several countries. Questionable leaders (Lybia, Iran, Russia, N. Korea, U.S.)
Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. Or worse, what if history has been revised to fit an agenda?
Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. Or worse, what if history has been revised to fit an agenda?
Bud Williams
Well-Known Member
I told my High school son this the other day...:lol:
Thomas Rogers
Well-Known Member
I thought it was:
Love the conspiracy nuts here. Any similarities between today and the 20s, 30s are contrived and a stretch, IMHO.
The #1 tactic of the "small minded" to further their cause against their "so-called" enemy is to villify them.
TJR
Love the conspiracy nuts here. Any similarities between today and the 20s, 30s are contrived and a stretch, IMHO.
The #1 tactic of the "small minded" to further their cause against their "so-called" enemy is to villify them.
TJR
Bud Williams
Well-Known Member
TJR,
You are so right with the villify them thing,
Let's see, Newt Gingrich, Dick Cheney, Sarah Palin all Villified by the Democrats.
Can you name a Democrat that has been so wrongly dragged through the mud
by Republicans?
You are so right with the villify them thing,
Let's see, Newt Gingrich, Dick Cheney, Sarah Palin all Villified by the Democrats.
Can you name a Democrat that has been so wrongly dragged through the mud
by Republicans?
Thomas Rogers
Well-Known Member
Bud asked:
Bill Clinton.
No guy should have to pay for a BJ in the court of public opinion...that is between the BJer, the guy, and the wife (which, come to think about it if the BJer was the wife, we wouldn't be having this conversation).
TJR
Bill Clinton.
No guy should have to pay for a BJ in the court of public opinion...that is between the BJer, the guy, and the wife (which, come to think about it if the BJer was the wife, we wouldn't be having this conversation).
TJR
Bud Williams
Well-Known Member
He was impeached! He lied under oath! I don't consider this villifying. The impeachment was about the rule of law. It didn't have anything to do with sex. He was disbarred!
Bill Clinton was villified like Richard Nixon was villified. Same thing, but Richard Nixon was not impeached! he was pardoned. He could have practiced law after he left office.
Bill Clinton was very corrupt, he was a accused rapist for crying out loud!:wacko:
Bill Clinton was villified like Richard Nixon was villified. Same thing, but Richard Nixon was not impeached! he was pardoned. He could have practiced law after he left office.
Bill Clinton was very corrupt, he was a accused rapist for crying out loud!:wacko:
Bill Barber
Well-Known Member
Rapist?
TrainTrac
Well-Known Member
Yep. Accused/Alleged, but never proven.
Look up Juanita Broaddrick.
Bud Williams
Well-Known Member
and she was very credible...JMHO
Jimmodifier999 Boyles
Active Member
A classic tactic of the left:
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Dont try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Dont try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.
Bill Barber
Well-Known Member
never heard about that TT, interesting.
Bud Williams
Well-Known Member
Must have been on your first tour of Yurt hunting....during the Clinton years, prices
were alot better then...:lol:
were alot better then...:lol:
Thomas Rogers
Well-Known Member
Budfrombground said:
Yes, he was impeached because he lied under oath.
The villification and the witch hunt started BEFORE that, before that testimony.
If no one ever asked the questions in the first place there would have been no lie.
It was an unfair question to ask any man. The question had no purpose being asked. All men are going to lie when asked that question. The question I am talking about is: "Did you have sex with that woman?"
There was no purpose in asking the question. The only reason to ask the question was to make the president look bad...i.e. to "villify"
TJR
Yes, he was impeached because he lied under oath.
The villification and the witch hunt started BEFORE that, before that testimony.
If no one ever asked the questions in the first place there would have been no lie.
It was an unfair question to ask any man. The question had no purpose being asked. All men are going to lie when asked that question. The question I am talking about is: "Did you have sex with that woman?"
There was no purpose in asking the question. The only reason to ask the question was to make the president look bad...i.e. to "villify"
TJR
