Bill V
Well-Known Member
With every news story about the flooding in New Orleans, you hear a report that most of the city "is built below sea level". But they never bother to answer the obvious follow-up questions--How, and why? If it's below sea level, and that close to the ocean, wouldn't that mean that at one time it was regularly under water? If so, how did they initially dry it out, to the point where they could build on it? And why did they do that, rather than building in some other area that is above sea level? Wasn't it obvious at that time that someday in the not too distant future, something like this was going to happen--a strong enough possibility to rule out developing a city there, regardless of what levees they might construct?
I'm not looking to point a finger or place blame here--just trying to get a better understanding of how this situation ever came to be. Thanks.
I'm not looking to point a finger or place blame here--just trying to get a better understanding of how this situation ever came to be. Thanks.