OT: Top 10 Ways to Make the World Cup More Exciting

Ford SportTrac Forum

Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Bill V

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
4,200
Reaction score
2
Location
Brooklyn Park, MN
From the Late Show with David Letterman website's weekly Top 10 contest:



Top Ten Ways to Make the World Cup More Exciting



10. Instead of players trading shirts after the game, swap wives.



9. Replace sideline Gatorade with vodka and tonic



8. Monkey referees



7. New slogan: "At least it's not hockey!"



6. No pants, more balls!



5. With hidden landmines, "sudden death" is no longer just in overtime



4. Oh, I don't know, maybe have some games where the score is not zero to zero?



3. You win a game, Angelina adopts a baby from your country



2. Give Dick Cheney some beer, a shotgun, and put him in at goalkeeper



1. 11 players, 10 uniforms
 
Suprisingly only 4 out of 31 matches have ended in a 0-0 tie. Being a soccer fan, I too struggle to watch boring games but knowing the game and understanding it allows me to be in the minority here in the US and enjoy watching the World Cup. Heck, I thought curling was boring until this past Olympics and then I couldn't get enough of it.
 
I've watched almost every game that has been on so far and if I miss the game, then I definetly check out the highlights. I know how important each game is, not only for the USA, but for every team, and that's what draws me into it. That's why I think that there is no "boring" games, because even though there aren't many goals in certain games, there are always runs or saves or shots that make the games exciting, for me at least.



I agree on the curling topic. The previous Olympics I enjoy watching a ton of it for the first time.
 
Yeah, I mean who knew curling attracted hot chicks?



I enjoy soccer, and to me, there is little that needs to be done to make it more exciting.
 
A fire pit on the middle of the field and rabid badgers running all over the field would also make it more exciting.



Ape Out.
 
There's been flares that have been ignited in the stands (there's your fire pit, even though not on the field) and at least one fan (rabid badger) that ran out on the field. :D
 
I purchased DVR just for the World Cup so I can have all the matches at my fingertips when I get home. I've tried to ignore the scores throughout the day but can't help but check on the scores. It has been quite an exciting first round so far and am amazed at the movement of the ball. The goalies hate this ball. I purchased this world cup ball and there is great movement. For anyone who isn't familiar with what I'm talking about think of a knuckleball pitcher throwing at 90mph.



STCTC - I think in this country you have to be an avid fan to appreciate the finer moments in soccer (switching the ball, give and go's, cranking the ball off the crossbar, etc.)...hence if you're just a casual fan...a 0-0 tie may be a boring match. I also find all the matches very entertaining.
 
Like any sport, the more you understand the finer points the more entertaining it is. The World Cup is a lot more excitng for me than the "World Series" even though I played a lot of baseball back in the day.
 
WC vs WS? At least the WS is only 7 games max. 84,455,940 games to get to the WS though.

Did watch some soccer sunday. Actually witnessed a goal!!!
 
64 games played so far...

75 goals have been scored...

average game time has been 93 minutes...

total minutes of all games...5,952



I like watching paint dry as much as the next person and...

we can talk aobut the "exciting strategy" and "fast pace" of the games...

but that comes out to one goal every 79 and half minutes give or take a few seconds.



and...

don't even get me started on why a nation of 299 million people can't produce 11 good soccer players...

we've scored one freaking goal and that was an "own" goal by the other team



Some of you soccer moms(and dads) need to get to work or we're taking back the minivans...

are we having fun yet?:eek:





 
Last edited by a moderator:
hefhay - That ball is wicked. I can see where the goalies are coming from after seeing some of those knuckling shots.



I wish I was still living in Europe, I would be attending some matches.
 
Regardless of whether you like soccer or the World Cup, I think the list is rather humorous. Even rabid soccer fans need to be able to laugh at themselves every now and then.



Regarding the game, I don't know--it seems to this casual observer that these soccer players aren't as talented as soccer fans want to make them out to be. I mean, for example, in basketball, players shoot a ball through a goal that is barely twice as large as the ball itself, and still hit it rather consistently. In hockey, they're shooting at a goal that is only roughly 4' x 6', and are able to put it in the goal frequently, relatively speaking. But in soccer, you have a goal the size of a respectable studio apartment, and teams struggle to find it even once per game? Yeah, I know there's defense, but in the three WC games I've seen, several times players have gotten behind the defense on a breakaway, shot the ball, and missed it--BY 20 YARDS--and the commentators are oohing and ahhing about how CLOSE the shot came! Come on--I've never played soccer, but I have kicked a ball, and know that I could get the ball in that large of a goal from that distance! With that glaring lack of kicking talent, there's no way these people can be the best in the world!



Also, I'll grant that this is my bias favoring the "American" sports--but some of these rules are absolutely ridiculous:

--Offsides being determined by where the DEFENDERS are located??? When you're on defense in any goal-oriented sport (basketball, hockey, air hockey, foosball, etc.), the best position to have yourself in is to be between your opponent and the goal. But in soccer, they actual REWARD defenders for getting themselves out of such a defensive position! Whose ludicrous idea was that?

--Two players try to head the ball. They both miss, and instead hit each others' heads. Both go down and need stretchers to help them off. And the clock--keeps running! Why??? The game is stopped--the clock should too! Same goes for goals, and balls out of play. Stop the clock already! Then, because of the lost time thanks to the fact that no one apparently knows how to push a "pause" button on a stopwatch, they add "injury time". But the amount of time is basically however much the referee wants to add! If he wants to extend the game 2 minutes, or 10 minutes, it's entirely up to him! Ridiculous.

--And then there's the stupid "cards". You get a yellow, you're warned. You get a red, you're out of the game. And two yellows is the same as a red. I understand and agree with everything so far. But then, additional rules say that if you get a red card, or two yellows in different games, you have to sit out another game too, automatically! (I might not have these numbers right, I apologize if they're wrong. But the concept is accurate to what they do.) That's ridiculous--If you're in a game with an incompetent or corrupt referee, I understand that there's not a lot you can do about that game--but his incompetence/corruptness shouldn't be allowed to screw you over in subsequent games as well! If someone's play was violent or unsportsmanlike enough to merit suspension from subsequent games, let the governing body do it after reviewing the evidence. Don't just entrust it to blind referees.



I could go on with this rant, but I'll stop here... :)



And for the record, I've enjoyed what I've seen of the game so far, and will watch more. But man, do some of these rules defy logic!
 
Bill, with the clock issue. They add "stopage" time at the end of the halves. I actually enjoy this because it means the game will be over in 90min, usually no more than 100min. I've never watched a soccer game that lasts 4 hours like an average baseball game....funny thing, had some friends over this weekend and we were watching, and one of the girls asked why they play past the 90min mark, to which I replied "they show standard seconds on the screen but they use metric seconds on the field" She just said "Oh" and there were a few seconds of silence before everyone else started laughing. We were all a little intoxicated, but it was the most enjoyable part of this year's WC yet.



On the carding issue, that happened to the US team against Italy, and 2 of the players were out for about half the game and will be out the next game. Pretty much every commentator disagreed with the calls and many said this would probably be the last time that particular referee was in a WC game.
 
Bill-

You're a bit confused.



I highly doubt that you could hit the goal from "those distances". You even know how far out they were? You even know how big a regulation pitch is? Much bigger then a football field. Until you've played the game, you can't really understand the difficulty involved. That's pretty funny how you claim to be better then the worlds best, yet never have played the game. And have no doubs, the players on the field are indeed the best in the world. Ever seen that show "Joes vs Pros"? Yeah, you remind me of those really cocky Joes that talk big, but can't do squat, even when not going against a Pro.



Offsides isn't determined by where the DEFENSE is, it's determined by where the OFFENSE is. If there are fewer then two DEFENSE players betwwen you and the goal and the ball is in possession of your team, you're offsides.



Do yourself a favor, turn the computer off, find a pick-up game of soccer, try to play for the full 90, after a few days recovery time, comeback and recant what you've said. You'll sound more respectable and less arrogant.
 
Jeff C--



I'm aware of the stoppage time. But why bother having it? Why not instead just stop the clock during the stoppage?



On carding, yes, I'm aware that the commentators said that it would likely be the last game that referee did during the tournament. But they're still making the players given the unjust cards sit out a game that the problematic referee has nothing to do with. IMHO, that's just plain wrong.



Tiger--



Yes, I know how far out they are. But it still looks like 90% of "shots" are shanked worse than Vanderjagt's kick against the Steelers.



No, I'm not familiar with Joes vs. Pros. Must be on cable, which I don't subscribe to. I believe they're the best in the world. But I think part of the problem that much of the US sporting population has with the game is that, in comparison to the talent shown by athletes in other sports, this seems, well, lacking. We see baseball players hit balls 400 feet, and we can't do that, so we're impressed. We see basketball players block shots 12 feet in the air, and we can't do that, so we're impressed. We see football players throw bullseye passes 60 yards downfield, and we can't do that, so we're impressed. And then we see players like McBride on Sunday, get by the defender, be about 20 yards away from the goal, and then shoot it not only not on goal, but 10 yards wide. We know we can do that just as badly, so we're not as impressed.



And your explanation of offsides being about where the offense is, not where the defense is--PUH-lease. Your explanation itself says it matters where the defense is. Saying it's all about the offense is like saying that offsides in hockey isn't about where the offense is positioned, but about where the line has positioned itself.



I'm not meaning to come across as cocky. I'm just expressing some of the disappointments I (and I suspect many other US fans) have with the game upon seeing it played.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol. I'm usually the keeper when we play. We play on a half field 9v9 and everybody is winded within the first half hour (keep in mind we usually play with the overseas students who grew up playing soccer. I couldn't hold a candle to them on the field, but after being a catcher in baseball and a goalie in hockey, keeper comes easily. They say I'm a natural, but I have nothing to compare it against, I just take it as someone who's played the sport for 10-15 years giving me a compliment.



And Trav, it's not if your team has posession, I think it's if your team passes the ball to you while you're past the defenders. Keeps players from cherry picking, which I think is good.
 
I played soccer for 13 years, stopping at college. I goalkept for 12 of them. My last year, I was named to the Class AA all-star team and represented our division in the all-star tournament. I've played against collegiate- and national-level players - one being a guy named Dave Walters who started for Penn State and also meddled with the U.S. National Team in his age group. There are others, but it has been six years and I forget named. Needless to say, I have played my fair share and faced my fair share.



Off-sides in soccer prevents cherry-picking. How easy it would be to send one gunner past the fullback or defenders to receive a long clear.



Scoring is low, but then again, there are eleven to a side, even if the pitch is huge.



Shooters hit shots wide not because they suck, but because of HOW they hit them. Any soccer player could knock a toeball (if your kid plays, this is the kick most begin with - it makes a thump noise and usually rises after release) towards the net. Professionals ordinarily try to strike the ball at its equator, keeping it low but a high velocity. An occasional chip or elongated lift is possible, but they lack power and are more for placement. Anyway, when a ball is ripped, but the kick is off center, it will take off. There is a sweet spot to a soccer ball, just as there is to a 450 foot homerun.



As for how easy it is, it is not easy. I attended goalkeeping schools and camps - three sessions per day of 3 hours each, July suns, six days in a week, with minimal rest in between. The distance covered by a keeper is much larger than the goalbox. The keeper starts the offense and anchors the defense.



With respect to the other players, imagine running 120 meters by 90 meters (though the sizes vary depending on where the field is located, I believe this is the olympic size) for 90 minutes. There are jogging breaks, but there is also constant motion. There is no room in the sport for David Wells, John Kruk, William Perry, Shaq, etc. It is one sport where size is nothing without speed, and the little guy is just as powerful as the larger guys. I looked at it as cross-country with a ball. Keepers are more stationary, but instead of constant movement, face insane burst sprints.



I've rambled enough. I love the sport. I will always miss not playing. The U.S. has solid sports, and is not truly interested in adding another. That is fair. We tried forcing the NFL on Europe, and we saw what happened. Two different cultures with two different preferences.



Since the U.S. just played Italy, here's Italy's keeper. I envy the skills and the fact that some continue get to do what I loved so much...
 
All I hear with soccer, it's 90 minutes of running. Please. Watch when they have a wide angle shot, half the players are milling around like it is halftime of a polo match. (if you are not sure what happens at half time of a polo match, watch Pretty Woman - Hollywood is where I get all of my 'high brow' knowledge.)



How to really make soccer better:



1. Smaller field (US football is better than Canadian football, US field is smaller)

2. Fewer players on field (fewer to get in the way of scoring)

3. Better subsitution (now they really would run a little more, if you look tired/walk around in hoop they pull you out)

4. No offsides (cherry picking encouraged)

5. If the above do not help up the scoring, then goalies must have max either 1 arm or 1 eye.

6. Make any goal scored using the 'seal move' worth 2 - much like the 3 pointer in hoop.



Some scoring would help this sport catch on.



JT#14







 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top