OT: Top 10 Ways to Make the World Cup More Exciting

Ford SportTrac Forum

Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Oh man....that response is too funny.



If you're dissapointed, try watching the game with an open mind.



Jeff, techinically yes, it's at the time of the pass....I was dumbing it down enough so Bill could understand....he obviously is an American Football fan and can't understand the intricies of a real game like soccer.
 
I guess soccer could be called a game - it's like Monopoly, which is just as boring and monotonous and usually ends in a tie when people finally give up.



Note - I believe I understand the game since I took it as an upper credit course in college and actually scored higher on the true/false questions than I did in my baseball class (I had played for 16 years and umpired for 6 years at that time (case of overthinking))



Also spent time filming the games (call it extra credit since the teacher of both previous classes was the soccer coach).



JT#14
 
I just read this news article. Thought I would share.



Devastated By U.S. World Cup Team's First-Round Loss, Nation Grinds To Halt



June 15, 2006



NEW YORK, LOS ANGELES, and WASHINGTON, DC—With the Dow Jones average down over 600 points, factory productivity in a downward spiral, and workplace attendance down by nearly a third, experts say the U.S. World Cup team's heartbreaking 3-0 defeat at the hands of Czech Republic on Monday has brought life across the soccer-crazed nation to a virtual standstill.

Enlarge ImageDevastated By U.S. World Cup Team's First-Round Loss, Nation Grinds To Halt



"What happened in Gelsenkirchen has indeed dealt a grievous blow to the morale of the American people," said President Bush, who had promised his constituency a swift and speedy victory in the World Cup this year and whose popularity has taken a 9 percent hit since the U.S. team's loss. "I want the citizens of this great nation, the world's only remaining superpower, to know that I grieve alongside them and urge them to be strong in our hour of darkness, and urge them to return to their jobs and schools despite their heavy hearts."



Mere days ago, the feeling across the nation was one of great joy, eager anticipation, and optimism for the prospects of the most talented American team to ever take the field. It is estimated that over 85 percent of U.S. households were watching the USA–Czech Republic matchup. And going into the game that most Americans have been waiting for, analyzing, and all but living for during the past four years, schools, offices, shopping centers—everything, in fact, except vital services—closed their doors as the game began.



Now, days after the end of penalty time, many of those doors are still closed.



"I take full responsibility for losing the game," said Claudio Reyna, whose shot off the crossbar of the Czech goal as the U.S. trailed 1-0 in the opening half of play has been shown to coincide with a significant bump in the suicide rate, a momentary increase in reports of domestic violence, and a $0.45 increase in the per-gallon price of gasoline. "But we still have games to play in this opening round. I realize that the United States, more than any other country, loves this game. But that is no reason for so many people to cancel their weddings."



The general feeling of hopelessness may be felt across the United States, the nation the rest of the world thinks of as Pelé's adopted home, the land that popularized the term "soccer," and Americans are finding many different ways to voice their despair.



Hundreds of yards of black bunting hung over the head and arms of the Statue of Liberty has yet to be removed by the New York City Parks Department; similar shrouds have appeared on Mount Rushmore, the Golden Gate Bridge, and Hawaii's Pearl Harbor Memorial. Las Vegas casinos are running skeleton staffs at the tables and doubling the size of security shifts, at once worrying over their empty floors and fearing retribution at the hands of World Cup gamblers who bet on the U.S. out of loyalty. And the House of Representatives, which traditionally remains closed throughout the World Cup, called a special session for the specific purpose of introducing a bipartisan bill that would change America's national sport back to baseball.



"This cannot last," said Bruce Arena, coach of the U.S. World Cup team and by extension effectively the second-most powerful man in America, in an address televised simultaneously on every national channel Wednesday night. "We cannot have crops unharvested in the fields, the doors of our churches sealed shut, the Stars and Stripes fixed at half-mast, all because of our dishonorable standard of play. We cannot ask you to forgive our loss to the Czechs, as that must be left to the wisdom of the God of our fathers. We have always been a nation blessed with strength, not only in our love for our soccer teams, but
 
Tiger, grow up. I understood what the rule is, long before your failed attempt to explain it.



I readily admit I do not understand why the rule is the way it is--the cherrypicking argument, as described by Adam, makes a bit of sense, but still leaves open other questions in my mind (such as, if not having the rule results in cherry picking, wouldn't that then encourage the defenders to get back on defense, which would take care of the cherrypicking? And/or, wouldn't it be better to do it more like hockey, where offsides is determined by the offending team's location with respect to the field, not with respect to the defenders? I'm not mocking when I ask this--I'd honestly like to know.)



Frankly, there is another reason that most Americans don't care for soccer, and that's this you-should-feel-guilty-for-not-liking-soccer attitude that so many European fans have toward Americans. Why would we want to even attempt to learn it, in those conditions? (I'll readily admit, this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black, as many US sports fans have similar attitudes about football and/or baseball. And this is part of the reason US football has struggled so much when it tries to get a toehold in Europe.)



And for those of you giving the "90 minutes of running" argument--I fully admit that the conditioning and endurance of soccer players appears to be amazing. I take nothing away from them there. But if that's all it took to gain the average sports fan's attention, triathlons would be the world's most popular spectator sport. So that conditioning really doesn't play a factor in the discussions of why soccer struggles for fan support in the US.
 
I'm grown; I'm not the one claiming to be better then the top athletes in a sport.



I've watched MANY baseball players miss an "easy" catch. Same for football. I wouldn't dare assume that had that been me, I'd make the catch every single time. Shoot, the area between the goal posts is HUGE, bigger then a soccer goal....yet I've seen kickers miss "give me" points. Does that mean that the kicker in question isn't at the top of his game? Or that an "armchair kicker" watching him on TV could do any better?





Why the rule the way it is?



Because a pitch is only broken into two halfs, not 6 sections such as hockey. It's kinda hard to have am imaginary line on a field and expect it to be enforced with any kind of regularity.



If there were no offsides, you'd see even less scoring. Teams would simply stack in front of the goal.



The rules makes a lot of sense if you think about it and how it relates to the way the game is played.



Soccer doesn't get the respect that it deserves because it's unlike any other American sport.



TJR-

Look at the stats a bit differently and you get a whole 'nother picture.



Game 7 of the NHL Stanley Cup (and by all reports, was a very exciting game) had a total of 50 shots on goal...yet the final point total was 4. That's a single score for every 12.5 shots.



The Swiss vs Togo yesterday for the Wordl Cup had a total of 15 shots on goal, with a final point total of 2. That's a goal for every 7.5 shots on goal.



Or, how about the Yankees vs Phillies games last nite? There were a total of 291 pitches, yet the final point total was only 6. That's a score for every 48.5 pitches.



What about football? In the last Superbowl, there were a total of 133 offensive plays, yet only 5 scores. That's a score for every 26.6 chances.



Finally, there's basketball. In the last game between the Mav's and Heat, there were 260 attempts to score, and 133 of those were successful, that's the best percentage so far at just under 2 attempts for every one success.



Your stats show a slow scoring game, but mine show a game that scores more often on every chance then all but one of the other major sports. It's all a matter of how you look at it.
 
How to really make soccer better:



1. Smaller field (US football is better than Canadian football, US field is smaller)

2. Fewer players on field (fewer to get in the way of scoring)

3. Better subsitution (now they really would run a little more, if you look tired/walk around in hoop they pull you out)

4. No offsides (cherry picking encouraged)

5. If the above do not help up the scoring, then goalies must have max either 1 arm or 1 eye.

6. Make any goal scored using the 'seal move' worth 2 - much like the 3 pointer in hoop.



Some scoring would help this sport catch on.



Now, you need to check out some indoor soccer games. It's basically a hockey arena with turf and goals built into the walls. When I played up in Pittsburgh, we played 7v7, including a goalie. There are no offsides, substitutions are on the fly, no out of bounds (unless it goes over the boards), and usually more goals are scored. It's definetly a faster paced game than the traditional sense, but basically the same concept.



Adam, did you play for any club teams in the spring? We faced some pretty stiff competition from PA teams at several tournaments, STM Tigers, Beadling, Celtic, and Dynamo to name a few.
 
I think soccer players need to understand that most US non-soccer players will never fully grasp the concept of this sport. It's just not going to happen with the American sports being so popular. I played and still play soccer at the age of 31. I played Division 1 college soccer and played against some very well known college teams (Penn State, Villanova, Seton Hall, etc.). I played against some current MLS players and even a US National player, Zach Thornton (Chicago Goalkeeper). If anyone is local to Philadelphia soccer and familiar with the Kixx...I played in college with Morris and Pappas. With this being said, I can tell you that striking a ball and "hitting the net" from 15-20 yards out is more difficult than most can comprehend. I would be willing to bet that those that think it's easy would struggle (1 out of 10) to hit a "one-timer" from 20 yards out and hit the net. And most likely...that one that goes on net would be saved by the keeper.



My only complaint about soccer is how players "dive" and need the magic spray/water. And enough with the stretcher to get the players off the field. Be a man and walk off the field. I broke my ankle playing baseball and hopped off the field. It pisses me off when someone is on the stretcher to get off the field and POOF!!! he's back up and running. I know in many cases...it's a chance to give them a quick break but enough of this crap.



And in defense of the soccer time clock...I think it's a perfect system. The end of the match may go an extra five minutes unlike basketball where the last 5 minutes takes 30 minutes.
 
Top