Thomas Rogers
Well-Known Member
See the story at the link below.
The guy is 84, so instead of the 30 year payout, he better take the 120M lump sum (before taxes).
The story said he and his wife will share the money with their 3 sons and their families. That's 4 families total.
By my calculations, if they are not greedy, they should get about $60M after taxes from the lump sum, and even at a low 5% yearly earnings rate on their investments, the four families could EACH have $750,000 a year to spend. And that's living only off the interest.
Would you be happy with $750,000 a year FOREVER, or would you get greedy?
TJR
The guy is 84, so instead of the 30 year payout, he better take the 120M lump sum (before taxes).
The story said he and his wife will share the money with their 3 sons and their families. That's 4 families total.
By my calculations, if they are not greedy, they should get about $60M after taxes from the lump sum, and even at a low 5% yearly earnings rate on their investments, the four families could EACH have $750,000 a year to spend. And that's living only off the interest.
Would you be happy with $750,000 a year FOREVER, or would you get greedy?
TJR