The State of General Motors

[Tom Schindler]

Someone that does not even know how to read is commenting on grammer.



You should be a comic.





Tom

 

[Thomas Rogers]

Now boys, you know when the "r" word comes out and a thread deterioriates that this picture isn't far behind:



[Broken External Image]:



TJR

 

[Ryan Schaecher]

Q-



When I first read that initial post you quote it looked awefully fishy to me. I still think so. Why bother "Quoting" when there is no author or source information? Without that, it's still plagerism.



Caymen-

Give me a source to lend some credibility to your post please, otherwise it appears as an opinion piece (which it is), not a fact-based article (which it's not) and will be treated as an opinion, which is how Q responded.



Opinions abound, facts speak loudly. Facts from multiple sources are hard to disprove.

 

[Travis Munday]

lol R Shek, fishy is a bit of an understatement. The 'article' certainly was not written by a professional writer, it lacks quality, comprehension, and even an understanding of formal language. The tone is very biased and unfounded, and while opinions normally are, most are smart enough to not masquerade them in an OpEd in this way, lest they want to be taken seriously. Sources are wonderful things the give something called "credibility", otherwise it's just a lame attempt for attention. Which, in hindsight, has worked.

 

[Travis Munday]

Perhaps, and in much less verbose way.