End of the Big 12--AVOIDED...

Ford SportTrac Forum

Help Support Ford SportTrac Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Bill V

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
4,200
Reaction score
2
Location
Brooklyn Park, MN
I'm very surprised that this hasn't been brought up yet here...



Colorado has officially accepted an invite to the Pac 10. Nebraska is expected to receive and accept an invite to the Big 10 within the next 24 hours. And Texas, Texas Tech, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State are all anticipated to be in the Pac 16 (or whatever it ends up being called) very soon. Leaving schools like Missouri, Kansas, K-State, Iowa State, and Baylor hunting for a home.



Thoughts? Good or bad for the Big 10 and Pac 10? Good or bad for the former Big 12 teams? Good or bad for college athletics (especially football) as a whole?



If it all comes to pass as anticipated, it essentially means the end of some of college football's longest, greatest rivalries (at least as conference foes)--Nebraska/Oklahoma has been played 85 times, 68 times for Colorado/Nebraska, Missouri/Nebraska have played 103 times, the Battle of the Brazos (Baylor/A&M ) has happened 105 times, Missouri/Oklahoma have a 94 game history, Baylor/Texas goes 99 games, and Kansas/Nebraska goes back a whopping 116 contests. And there are more rivalries that could perish, depending on where the Orphaned Five end up, and if they can stay together or not.



Personally, from a strictly athletics perspective, I think that if six teams from the Big 12 go to the Pac 16, it would be wise for the Big 10 to expand beyond the proposed 12 (current 11 plus Nebraska) or 13 (many talks have them taking Missouri as well), and also go to 16 teams. However, who the other additions would be may take some time. Everyone knows the Big 10 wants Notre Dame, and they supposedly also want Rutgers and Maryland. (Although frankly, I don't get that. Having Rutgers and Maryland in the same conference as Iowa and Nebraska just doesn't sit right with me mentally.) So there could be room for one to three more former Big 12 teams in the new Big 10--but I don't see them taking more than that. Baylor, for one, is going to be struggling to find a home. And there is also talk that even if the Big 10 wants some of these Big 12 schools athletically, they don't want them academically.



The next couple weeks will be VERY interesting...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I almost couldn't believe this when I saw it yesterday. I'm a die hard Nebraska fan and the biggest game of the year has always been Nebraska and Oklahoma, with Colorado in a close second. So now I have to find a new team to hate :angry:!! O well one will come up, I hope :grin:.
 
Oh no, does this mean Texas and Oklahoma can't just win against the other and then beat up on their conference all year and get a shot at the BCS CG? Colorado is a perfect fit for Pac 10: over-ranked just like their new home conference. Texas would dominate, especially with USC in a post season ban.



Looks like the Pac X thinks they could compete with the SEC by adding some powerhouses to the conference. It'll probably just mean the end of USC dominance over cupcake teams, and those embarrassing losses to Stanford will lose their sting...because now of course, Stanford would be a serious team in a serious conference.
 
OK, it now appears that Texas and Oklahoma are staying in the "Big 12", as are everyone else besides Nebraska (Big 10) and Colorado (Pac 10), and the conference will survive, at least for the time being.



But this begs the question--



Does anyone else see the intrinsic problem with the "Big 10" having 12 teams, and the "Big 12" having 10 teams???
 
Last night's news said everyone else was staying (except Colorado and Nebraska) So the Big 12 will only have 10 teams for a while. I guess they can't call it the Big 12 anymore, but the cant call it the Big 10 either. Sounds like the Big 12 name will get changed to something like the Best 10...:bwahaha::bwahaha:



...Rich
 
Richard L, why can't they call it the Big 10? After all, the conference which has been called the "Big 10" now has 12 teams, so the two can simply swap names...at least until the "Big 10" expands again to fourteen or so teams...
 

Latest posts

Top