JohnnyB, that's weak. I don't think the shooters in your sensational circumstances would have met the "suspicious look" criteria used by the NY stop and frisk program. I don't think your city is so unique that nobody else can possibly form an opinion, either.
But, as long as the Constitution doesn't matter... Stop and frisk is just too subjective and leaves too much discretion to a public administrator to decide who looks suspicious. I have to wonder, is there police training on how to determine what a suspicious person looks like? I'd be interested to see that training.
BTW, I use public administrator for emphasis. With the utmost respect for those police truly serving and protecting with their oath of office in mind, I disagree with the expanded powers of public administrators that gives a high school graduate a gun, military training and turned loose on the public streets to look for suspicious people rather than respond to emergency situations where the facts are known.
Redfish, Terry v. Ohio is one of the cases I believe the Supreme Court got wrong.
I think it's clear what a suspicious black person looks like. If unsure, ask NY police.
But...,
What does a suspicious white person look like?
What does a suspicious Latino look like?
What does a suspicious Asian look like?
Remember, they're stereotypes, and by some accounts on here, that's completely different and okay and not racist. So, just so I can avoid looking suspicious and getting unconstitutionally detained and groped by a public administrator on a power trip, please answer those questions. I seriously want to see answers to this.