Casual observation from being in Canada tells me that their large minority population is Asian.
Asians certainly weren't a minority based on casual observation in Vancouver, or as it has been called by its residents due to this, Hong Couver.
I blame the lack of aspirations to "thug life" for the dramatic lack of crime in Canada. Shoot, I remember a bus driver telling an anecdote of why he would never go into Surrey again, because when he was an ambluance driver, a "gang" shot at him.
I think he was just embellishing, as there is no crime in Canada. :grin:
Also, minorities are typically more prevalent, as is low income housing, etc (which came first?).
TJR, can we come up for a better term than "minorities"? In Baltimore, for instance, Blacks are not a "minority" at <A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltimore#Demographics">63.4%</A> of the population.
Taking an existing word and turning it into a constant euphemism for "blacks and hispanics" cheapens the language, as it completely ignores the defnition of the term, as seen here, where the "minority" refers to the majority in Baltimore. :angry:
If by "low income housing", you mean public tenements and the like, then the poor "minorities" came first; I doubt there's ever been a city that would erect cheap housing at the taxpayers expense to lure in bountiful supplies of cheap labor. It seems like it'd open a Pandora's box. Then again, that probably means that Government thought it was a good idea, though in MD, all examples of public housing came after the "minorities" took up roost, bringing in the vandalism, muggings, gun crimes, drugs, and patented ability to turn formerly upstanding & affluent areas into crime ridden slums straight out of Robocop.