A post I just made in another thread prompted me to post this. I have been a proponent of non-ethanol gas for a while now. I'll copy what I posted in the other thread for one experience that I keep seeming to duplicate.
"Use non-ethanol gas if you can find it. I feel like a crusader against ethanol, but my truck runs so much better with non-ethanol. I just did a 260+ mile round trip to the off road park yesterday and I'm estimating that I'm still in the high teens on gas mileage, even with 35s and now a roof basket with a 35" spare on top. Averaged probably 60 mph on the way there and 70 mph on the way back (had to catch the Dawgs playing). I used 3/4 of a tank for the entire trip, there and back, including the strenuous activity I forced on it off road. If I just count the road miles and totally exclude what I did off road, I ran 266 miles (according to Google maps not my inaccurate odometer) on about 15, let's say 17 to be safe, gallons of gas. Conservative estimates put me at 15 mpg; more reasonable estimates put me over 17. Is anyone's stock STs with ethanol-abused gas getting 17 mpg in conditions less strenuous than I have required of my truck?"
Similar experiences by others? Disputes? Do I just have an awesomely fuel efficient ST and the non-ethanol gas isn't making a difference or is ethanol as evil as I believe? For the record, I run cheap Kroger gasoline with 10% ethanol in the Edge because we get a dollar off per gallon each month and only have to fill it up once per month. No fuel efficiency gains outweigh $1/off per gallon, lol.
"Use non-ethanol gas if you can find it. I feel like a crusader against ethanol, but my truck runs so much better with non-ethanol. I just did a 260+ mile round trip to the off road park yesterday and I'm estimating that I'm still in the high teens on gas mileage, even with 35s and now a roof basket with a 35" spare on top. Averaged probably 60 mph on the way there and 70 mph on the way back (had to catch the Dawgs playing). I used 3/4 of a tank for the entire trip, there and back, including the strenuous activity I forced on it off road. If I just count the road miles and totally exclude what I did off road, I ran 266 miles (according to Google maps not my inaccurate odometer) on about 15, let's say 17 to be safe, gallons of gas. Conservative estimates put me at 15 mpg; more reasonable estimates put me over 17. Is anyone's stock STs with ethanol-abused gas getting 17 mpg in conditions less strenuous than I have required of my truck?"
Similar experiences by others? Disputes? Do I just have an awesomely fuel efficient ST and the non-ethanol gas isn't making a difference or is ethanol as evil as I believe? For the record, I run cheap Kroger gasoline with 10% ethanol in the Edge because we get a dollar off per gallon each month and only have to fill it up once per month. No fuel efficiency gains outweigh $1/off per gallon, lol.