This situation is dangerous because it is how the Bush Administration is in part funding
the federal government –by selling our debt to the Chinese. This August, the Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) projected that the federal government will accumulate a $401 billion
deficit next year –not including the additional $87 billion request for Iraq.
Not to turn this into Politics, but it is actually the US Treasury that handles foreign transactions with other countries based on what the Congress sets as the Budget. The Federal Reserve is the only entity that can buy and sell US debt as origionally produced. The Administration (be it Reagan, Bush, Carter, Clinton, Vermanjasick, etc) has no say in what US debt is sold where and for how much.
Before you start blaming Bush for everything, do your research and you'll find that a good portion of the rules governing foreign transactions of US debt, along with a good percentage of the debt sold to China occured during the Clinton administration. You know why there was a "quote" balanced budget under Clinton? Most of the debt that was on record before he took office was transferred to long term bonds (being 10 years or more) so as to not affect the bottom line during his adminitration. Those bonds are comming due and are not being rolled into additional long-term bonds.
But back to ExxonMobile. This is a Capitalist society. We are free to choose the products we buy, including our cars. If people want a H3 or Suburban to drive their crumb crunchers around with, fine. You have to accept all that goes with it including the high fuel usage costs.
Do you go to McDonalds for Dinner? McDonald's profit margin is nearly double that of ExxonMobile. Do you complain that your happy meals are costing you an arm and a leg? Something that is near and dear to my heart is the cost of firearm ammunition. Winchester (Olin Brass actually) has a pretty hefty profit margin on most of it's products. They are able too since that is what people will pay for it.
That's what's happening with fuel. There is a point where diminishing marginal returns will begin to take a higher chunk of the profits out. THat is when the speculators will begin to loose money and the market will come back into alignment.
It's my belief that it's not that we are paying such high fuel prices, it that just two years ago gas was 1/2 the price it is now. If it took 5 years to go from $1.50 to $3/gallon, the outrage would not be nearly as high. Heck I can recall paying sub $.80/gallon in 1999 while living in Tulsa. It's not that fuel has gone up, it's the time range that is has gone up.