Thomas Rogers
Well-Known Member
If your well-meaning politicians have their way it will be so:
a Democrat-controlled Congress is seen as more likely to agree to the idea than one controlled by Republicans
You would thing congress would first tackle the Federal income tax problems.
When a Democrat takes back the presidency in 2008, there is the national debt to pay back before another Republican can cut tax's than bring it back up.
Or, we could just cut welfare but of course that's the democrats votes.
For my business, PA already requires that I file a "Use Tax" along with the Sales Tax I collect.
When a Democrat takes back the presidency in 2008, there is the national debt to pay back before another Republican can cut tax's than bring it back up.
(USA-Today, 2006) http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-02-20-debate-oppose_x.htmEver since the Senate approved the last major tax relief bill, in 2003, revenues have increased every year. In 2004, they went up 5.5%. Last year, they rose 14.5%, the largest increase in nearly 25 years.
Republicans' decision to reduce taxes on capital gains and dividends provides a good case study in effective tax policy. When we enacted these measures in 2003, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that revenues would decline by $27 billion over the next two years. Instead, it turned out that the tax cut stimulated investment and increased revenues by $26 billion — a $53 billion difference.
.If we really want to avoid burdening our children and grandchildren with debt — which does represent a major problem — we need to reform entitlement programs. Within the lifetimes of today's college students, the combined budgets of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will consume all federal revenues, leaving nothing for defense, education, housing or any other program