Thomas Rogers
Well-Known Member
Caymen said:
And that there, my friend, is the difference between a unionized job that has the worker putting "tops and bottoms" and a job as a professional in a non-union company.
Before you get your panties in a twist, let me explain.
As a professional working most of my life for non-union companies I have counted on and demanded that my compensation reflect NOT ONLY the value I bring to the company in the day-to-day tasks and responsibilities assigned BUT THAT it also reflect my experience, my skills and the flexibility and depth that brings to me as a resource of the company I am working at.
We have this old saying in IT, and it's called "Bench strength"...as in "he brings a lot of strength to our bench". It's a sports term. Some sports figures you pay top dollar just to have them on the bench when you need them.
So, this notion that I should get paid the same as the other guy because we are doing the same job is so foreign to me. Yes, I understand it, and I understand it is entrenched in blue-collar jobs.
But I will ask this: If for such positions people doing the same thing should get paid the same, why is it that there are yearly pay increases? Why is it that the 20 year old kid just hired gets paid a lot less to do a job; the same job; as someone who has been doing it for 25 years? It's the same job, right? I am sure this is happening for many types of jobs.
TJR
My talent does exceed everyone in my department. I have forgotten more than most of those guys know. Even though my talent does exceed theirs, we still perform the same job, therefore, we deserve the same pay.
And that there, my friend, is the difference between a unionized job that has the worker putting "tops and bottoms" and a job as a professional in a non-union company.
Before you get your panties in a twist, let me explain.
As a professional working most of my life for non-union companies I have counted on and demanded that my compensation reflect NOT ONLY the value I bring to the company in the day-to-day tasks and responsibilities assigned BUT THAT it also reflect my experience, my skills and the flexibility and depth that brings to me as a resource of the company I am working at.
We have this old saying in IT, and it's called "Bench strength"...as in "he brings a lot of strength to our bench". It's a sports term. Some sports figures you pay top dollar just to have them on the bench when you need them.
So, this notion that I should get paid the same as the other guy because we are doing the same job is so foreign to me. Yes, I understand it, and I understand it is entrenched in blue-collar jobs.
But I will ask this: If for such positions people doing the same thing should get paid the same, why is it that there are yearly pay increases? Why is it that the 20 year old kid just hired gets paid a lot less to do a job; the same job; as someone who has been doing it for 25 years? It's the same job, right? I am sure this is happening for many types of jobs.
TJR