scott degroot
Well-Known Member
l1tech,
I grant you that the error codes do not always pinpoint the exact failing part (as your BMW customer found out) but it does point you in the right direction.
Had he not already replaced the O2-Sensors, you probably would have first thought they were bad and had to run diagnostics on them as well and charged him more. Since he already replaced the O2-Sensors, that's the most obvious solution, and so you were able to look at something less obvious. That should have saved him some money in diagnostic services?? And he does have two new O2-Sensors and peace of mind that they should last for a little while
Never have I ever pulled a lean code for both bank 1 and bank 2 and thought to myself...hmmm I bet the O2 sensors are bad...that dog don't hunt and any person who thinks they know anything about diagnostics adn comes to that assumption should never be allowed to hold a wrench. 99.9% of the time you get a lean code on both banks of a maf equipped engine you have false air entering somewhere behind the maf sensor. O2 sensors...ha...when is the last time you saw 2 oxygen sensors fail at exactly the same time?? So no my first thought in the BMW situation was a vacuum leak which was verified with propane...it actually took longer for the scanner to boot up and retreive the code than it did for me to locate the issue.
In regards to your Toyota. I wouldn't have looked at the so called "diagnostic printout" form the parts store either as it had nothing on it other than a code, which I am sure was some sort of evap leak code and being that there is no code for Toyota vehicles that states the evap canistor is faulty the system would have to be tested and being that Toyota evap systems are overly complex the charge would have been appropriate.