shek, your latest message was messing up the display, so I removed it. Please feel free to repost your comment.
A couple of years ago, when Kalama joined and became an active member of the site, she wrote and asked me what the ground rules were for posting her "art" on the site. I explained my policies. At the time, the member library was hosted in a data center with heavy restrictions on adult content, so, in addition to the obvious concerns about a "family friendly web site," I also needed to be very careful about the hosting situation.
I can't tell you how many times I've explained the rules to a member or guest, and gotten attitude back, as if I don't have a right to make rules in my place of business.
Not so with Kalama.
She accepted my explanation and each of my subsequent decisions regarding her photos with polite grace. She followed my requests without fail, and before any image of questionable content came up, she would email me for approval first. If I told her a photo was too racey for the site, she respected my wishes without the slightest objection.
We have a long established history on this site of allowing off-topic conversation. Nothing Kalama has done has violated the guidelines. As far as I am concerned, she's a model member.
If you don't like her photos, her web site, her desire to be in the photos, etc., I suggest you avoid the topic altogether. She's an adult. Her fans are adults. Whatever the consequences of their choice, it rests entirely with them. If members care to have an intellectual debate on the merits of the photos, the psychology behind them, objectification, etc., that's fine, too. Do so with respect for one another and remain within the guidelines, and all will be well.